Pedagogical strategies and emerging technologies: impact on literacy and academic performance in rural students from Loja, Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64747/vrvtsd67

Keywords:

literacy, rural education, educational technology, active pedagogical strategies, student perception

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of active pedagogical strategies and emerging technologies on the development of literacy skills and academic performance among middle, upper basic, and high school students in a rural area of Loja, Ecuador. Using a mixed-methods approach, diagnostic tests, structured surveys, and academic record reviews were applied to a sample of 60 students, 6 teachers, and 2 administrators. Quantitative results show that over 50% of students scored at basic or insufficient reading comprehension levels, revealing a persistent gap in rural literacy achievement. However, a significant positive correlation was found between favorable student perception of educational technology and academic performance in Language and Literature, supporting the hypothesis that digital tools can enhance essential skills. Qualitative findings reinforce this pattern, emphasizing benefits such as increased motivation, timely feedback, and broader access to digital content. Despite structural limitations—such as poor internet connectivity and insufficient teacher training in ICT—the findings support the transformative potential of a contextually grounded technology integration in rural educational environments. The study concludes that the effectiveness of this integration depends on inclusive public policies, reliable infrastructure, active pedagogical strategies, and sustained teacher development.

References

Area, M., & Pessoa, T. (2021). La brecha digital como expresión de desigualdad educativa. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(67), 1-22.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2019). Adding 21st century literacies to the mix. Multiliteracies, 2(1), 1–30.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2022). Educación profunda: tecnología, pedagogía y cambio sistémico. Ediciones Morata.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2020). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 1-10.

MINEDUC. (2023). Estadística Educativa Volumen 4. Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador.

Puentedura, R. R. (2021). SAMR Model: Transformation, Technology, and Education. Redefinition Framework.

Salinas, J., & Marín, V. I. (2020). Estrategias didácticas activas en contextos digitales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 82(2), 35-56.

UNESCO. (2022). Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo: América Latina. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–27.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-05

How to Cite

Cabrera Toledo, L. A., Castillo Namicela, G. F., Jaramillo Granda, P. N., & Paola del Cisne, O. S. (2025). Pedagogical strategies and emerging technologies: impact on literacy and academic performance in rural students from Loja, Ecuador. Horizonte Cientifico International Journal, 3(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.64747/vrvtsd67